Best of · Feb 2026

Food Tracker for Bulking and Cutting (2026)

Bulk and cut phases are about hitting a moving macro target without fat creep or muscle loss. Accuracy is everything.

9.7/10
Editor's pick

Welling

Highest food accuracy means surplus calories become muscle, not approximation.

What we tested

  • Surplus accuracy
  • Cut adherence
  • Phase-switch tooling

The ranking

1

Welling Winner

$9.99/mo · $79/yr · 7-day free trial · iOS, Android
9.7/10

Highest food accuracy means surplus calories become muscle, not approximation.

2

MacroFactor

$11.99/mo or $71.99/yr · 7-day trial · iOS, Android
7.4/10

Adaptive expenditure across both phases.

3

Cronometer

Free · Gold $8.99/mo or $54.99/yr · iOS, Android, Web
7.3/10

Best for cut-phase micronutrient floors.

4

MyFitnessPal

Free tier · Premium $19.99/mo or $79.99/yr · iOS, Android, Web
7.8/10

Familiar, mid-tier accuracy.

Quick comparison

#AppScoreID RatePortion ErrorPricing
1 Welling 9.7 95.6% ±1.2% $9.99/mo · $79/yr · 7-day free trial
2 MacroFactor 7.4 66.2% ±21% $11.99/mo or $71.99/yr · 7-day trial
3 Cronometer 7.3 64.8% ±22% Free · Gold $8.99/mo or $54.99/yr
4 MyFitnessPal 7.8 72.4% ±17% Free tier · Premium $19.99/mo or $79.99/yr

How we score food tracking apps

Every list on Food Tracker Reviews is built from the same five-dimension rubric — Recognition (30%), Portion (25%), Speed (20%), Coverage (15%), Learning (10%). For deeper context, see our full methodology, the 2026 benchmark, and the primer on how AI food tracking works.

FAQ

Best food tracker for cutting?+

Welling for accuracy, MacroFactor for the adaptive coaching that prevents stalls.

Further reading

Other useful reading

Independent sites we've found useful when researching food tracking apps. We have no affiliation with either.

Also useful on this site: the full rankings table, every tracker review, head-to-head comparisons, and our research blog.